Appellants Factum (July 5, 1999)
Crown argues that trial judge ruled in error that Parker's rights had been violated in denying him cannabis because there are legal alternatives (i.e. Marinol), and that marijuana only enhances conventional medications. Argues that the judges' order to return violates licensing schemes by Parliament.

Epilepsy Association of Toronto Amicus Brief

Respondent's Factum (September 13, 1999)
Parker's medical history and use of pharmaceutical medications and marijuana; summary of testimony by Dr. Morgan, Dr. Kallant, Dr. Goodhew, and Bruce Rowsell, Director of the Bureau of Drug Surveillance for Health Canada; review of evidence filed from Regina v. Clay; trial judge's reasons for judgment; response to appellant's issues.

 Testimony of Dr. John Goodhew (October 1997)
An M.D. specializing in the treatment of AIDS, Dr. Goodhew testified about his experience prescribing synthetic THC pills Narvalon and Marinol and overseeing patients who use medical marijuana.