Drug Policy Alliance Logo
About Take Action News Publications and Library Blog Contact Donate Events Community eStore
Home > News > Yes on 5: Martin Sheen Is Wrong

News News

Donate Now Brilliant Flame (Orange)

re:FORM 2010

Marijuana: The Facts
What's Wrong With the Drug War?
Overdose
Safety First: Parents, Teens and Drugs
Drug By Drug
State By State
Reducing Harm: Treatment and Beyond
Drugs, Police & the Law
Communities Affected
Drug Policy Around the World
Publications and Library
What People are Talking About

Your Email
> Manage Subscriptions
What People are Talking About

Join the Drug Policy Alliance Network's work to promote drug policies based on science, compassion, health, and human rights.
Donate
> Get Involved
In this Section
bottom
The Latest

Tell the President: Don't Interfere With State Marijuana Laws



Send A Message
Full Text Resources

> more

Featured News

Humboldt County's Pot Culture Is a Boon for Some-- Sacramento Bee (CA) [12/15/09]

> more news

 

Suggested Web sites
> more links

  

Yes on 5: Martin Sheen Is Wrong
Thursday, August 28, 2008

Margaret Dooley-Sammuli 60x85Last time I checked, Martin Sheen was an actor, not a policy expert. But that hasn’t stopped him from asking our elected officials to oppose Prop. 5. In a letter last week, Mr. Sheen urged our representatives in Sacramento to ignore all of the state’s public health advocates and side with him.

He’s asking a lot: the state’s leading addiction treatment and mental health groups all support Prop. 5.

I am disappointed that Mr. Sheen, a person who has struggled with addiction himself for years, is opposed to Prop. 5 — a measure that would significantly expand funding for drug treatment and drug courts, and focus resources on the underlying problems faced by so many nonviolent offenders in this state. For sure, Mr. Sheen has endured tough, personal experiences that have left him with strong views on addiction. His experience and perspective deserve respect; but they do not define good state policy.

He says Prop. 5 won’t help. He is wrong now—just like he was wrong back in 2000.

In 2000, Mr. Sheen opposed Proposition 36, the state’s ground-breaking treatment-not-incarceration law, claiming that it wouldn’t help people struggling with addiction. Voters disagreed, approving Prop. 36 with a 61 percent landslide. Since then, 84,000 people have completed Prop. 36 drug treatment. Without Prop. 36, most of them would never have been offered any help. At the same time, Prop. 36 has already saved taxpayers almost $2 billion.

Each and every Prop. 36 graduate has better life prospects, especially in terms of family and employment. I have the privilege of working with many Prop. 36 graduates and other people in long-term recovery from alcohol and other drug problems. I partner with people in recovery to fight for something we are all passionate about: ending addiction and increasing resources to achieve that goal. That is why so many people in recovery support Prop. 5. 

Prop. 5 builds on the success of Prop. 36, making treatment available to more nonviolent offenders and, for the first time, to young people in California. By increasing funding to treatment, Prop. 5 will help more people and save more taxpayer dollars.

Martin Sheen has his perspective. But even though he’s a Hollywood star, his vote won’t count any more than yours or mine will on November 4th. Remember to vote Yes on 5!

Sincerely,

Margaret Dooley-Sammuli
Deputy Campaign Manager, Yes on 5
Deputy State Director, Southern California
Drug Policy Alliance Network



Provide Feedback on this Page:

* 1.




 2.



 3.



   Please leave this field empty