Drug Policy Alliance Logo
About Take Action News Publications and Library Blog Contact Donate Events Community eStore
Home > News > Social Justice Advocates Tackle Tough Questions in L.A.

News News

Donate Now Brilliant Flame (Orange)

re:FORM 2010

Marijuana: The Facts
What's Wrong With the Drug War?
Overdose
Safety First: Parents, Teens and Drugs
Drug By Drug
State By State
Reducing Harm: Treatment and Beyond
Drugs, Police & the Law
Communities Affected
Drug Policy Around the World
Publications and Library
What People are Talking About

Your Email
> Manage Subscriptions
What People are Talking About

Join the Drug Policy Alliance Network's work to promote drug policies based on science, compassion, health, and human rights.
Donate
> Get Involved
In this Section
bottom
The Latest

Tell the President: Don't Interfere With State Marijuana Laws



Send A Message
Full Text Resources

> more

Featured News
> more news

 

Suggested Web sites
> more links

  

Social Justice Advocates Tackle Tough Questions in L.A.
Wednesday, October 11, 2006

On October 10, social justice advocates and community members gathered to discuss the state of social justice reform in California.

The state legislature cut funding this year to Prop 36, California's treatment-instead-of-incarceration law, which won 61 percent of the vote in 2000. In 2004, the people rejected Prop 66, a Three Strikes reform initiative. In order to examine the barriers to social justice reform, advocates gathered at the Drug Policy Alliance's Southern California office, where they looked back on attempted reforms as well as ahead to momentum-building and the movement's next steps. 

Over dinner, about 25 advocates and community members spent the first part of the evening venting their frustration at recent failed reforms. The group noted all that went wrong with Three Strikes reform in 2004: an imperfectly drafted initiative, a troubled pro-reform coalition, and finally, in the last moments of the campaign, an unprecedented multi-million dollar opposition ad campaign.

Treatment providers in the audience then analyzed the under-funding of Prop 36 this year: treatment providers were distracted and divided, law enforcement was pushing hard for zero funding, and legislators fell back on politics as usual rather than sound policy.

With the past failures and problems out in the open, the discussion turned toward next steps. The refunding of Prop 36 in June 2007 surfaced as the movement's next opportunity for victory. Margaret Dooley of DPA Southern California, who led the discussion, said, "This meeting gave us an important opportunity to regroup, reassess and reenergize. After the discussion, our consensus was that we can learn from our experiences this year and do better in 2007, when Prop 36 funding is up for renewal again."

Participants in the discussion represented the range of groups working on this issue: Dave Fratello, co-author of Prop 36, Campaign for New Drug Policies; Luis Lozano, Executive Director, The Beacon House; Susan Burton, Executive Director, A New Way of Life; Cheryl Branch, Chair, AAAOD; Gretchen Bergman, Executive Director, A New PATH; Peter Laarman, Director, Progressive Christians Uniting; Cynthia McDonald, Prop 36 graduate, San Diego County; Tony Jackson, Prop 36 graduate, Orange County; Alberto Mendoza, DPA Southern California Director.



Provide Feedback on this Page:

* 1.




 2.



 3.



   Please leave this field empty