Drug Policy Alliance Logo
About Take Action News Publications and Library Blog Contact Donate Events Community eStore
Home > News > Election Day 2004 - Voters Say Yes on 69 in California

News News

Donate Now Brilliant Flame (Orange)

re:FORM 2010

Marijuana: The Facts
What's Wrong With the Drug War?
Overdose
Safety First: Parents, Teens and Drugs
Drug By Drug
State By State
Reducing Harm: Treatment and Beyond
Drugs, Police & the Law
Communities Affected
Drug Policy Around the World
Publications and Library
What People are Talking About

Your Email
> Manage Subscriptions
What People are Talking About

Join the Drug Policy Alliance Network's work to promote drug policies based on science, compassion, health, and human rights.
Donate
> Get Involved
In this Section
bottom
The Latest

Tell the President: Don't Interfere With State Marijuana Laws



Send A Message
Full Text Resources

> more

Featured News

Humboldt County's Pot Culture Is a Boon for Some-- Sacramento Bee (CA) [12/15/09]

> more news

 

Suggested Web sites
> more links

  

Election Day 2004 - Voters Say Yes on 69 in California
November 3, 2004

California voters have approved a ballot initiative, Proposition 69, to create a statewide database of DNA. The state will pay for this registry by raising the fines on many minor offenses.

All felony adult and juvenile arrestees, even those not charged or convicted, will be required to submit a sample of DNA taken by a swab of the mouth. The Drug Policy Alliance was concerned about several aspects of this initiative:

  1. Seizing property (including genetic information) without due process of law.
  2. The further erosion of the line between guilty and not guilty in our society.
  3. Increased penalties for minor crimes such as jaywalking or marijuana possession.
  4. The creation of a mammoth state program that -- due to human or technological error -- will likely result in innocent people being incarcerated.
  5. The creation of a new, nonviolent felony offense that could result in life sentences until the "three-strikes" law is revised.


Provide Feedback on this Page:

* 1.




 2.



 3.



   Please leave this field empty