Thursday, December 1, 2005
"The cabaret law itself is absurd. It's totalitarian. Two years ago the only places it was illegal to dance were Manhattan and Afghanistan. And now you can dance in Afghanistan." These were the words of a New York City nightclub owner speaking to the Village Voice in 2002. Now, three years later, a possibility for change may finally be in sight.
As the result of a lawsuit brought in June 2005, lawyer Paul Chevigny and the four dancers he represents may get the hated cabaret laws, which restrict dancing to venues that are licensed and located in specific areas of the city, repealed. This depends on the court recognizing that dance is “expressive behavior,” and is therefore a protected personal right under the New York State constitution.
Although residents and politicians alike typically say the issue behind the laws is noise control, often the specter of drug use is lumped in as part of the reason to keep the antiquated restrictions in place. Much like the RAVE Act the cabaret laws are seen by law enforcement and city officials as an easy way to curb drug use - at the expense of people's freedom to enjoy music and dancing.
Chevigny has submitted statements totaling over 100 pages of evidence from a range of small club and bar owners, dance teachers, dance historians, choreographers, musicologists and dancers asserting that dance is a meaningful activity. The City has responded by asking for the case to be dismissed without even being heard. They have until December 9 to file paperwork supporting their request. After that, the court will decide if the case will proceed to trial.
You can help end these absurd restrictions! Sign a petition calling for reform of the cabaret laws and check out Legalize Dancing NYC for more ways to get involved.
|