Drug Policy Alliance Logo
About Take Action News Publications and Library Blog Contact Donate Events Community eStore
Home > News > Press Room > Press Releases > Legislature Eliminates Funding for Prop 36 Voter-Mandated Drug Treatment; Ends Incarceration of Nonviolent Drug Offenses

News News

Reform Conf 2009

Marijuana: The Facts
What's Wrong With the Drug War?
Overdose
Safety First: Parents, Teens and Drugs
Drug By Drug
State By State
Reducing Harm: Treatment and Beyond
Drugs, Police & the Law
Communities Affected
Drug Policy Around the World
Publications and Library
What People are Talking About

Your Email
> Manage Subscriptions
What People are Talking About

Join the Drug Policy Alliance Network's work to promote drug policies based on science, compassion, health, and human rights.
Donate
> Get Involved
In this Section
bottom
The Latest

An Exit Strategy for the Drug War



Send A Message
Full Text Resources

> more

Featured News

What Would Marijuana Legalization Look Like?-- Capitol Weekly (Sacramento, CA) [11/19/09]

> more news

 

Suggested Web sites
> more links

  

Legislature Eliminates Funding for Prop 36 Voter-Mandated Drug Treatment; Ends Incarceration of Nonviolent Drug Offenses
For Immediate Release: Wednesday, June 17, 2009. Contact: Daniel Abrahamson 501-295-5635 or Stephen Gutwillig 323-542-2606

The Budget Conference Committee approved Gov. Schwarzenegger’s proposal to eliminate funding for Prop 36, California’s landmark treatment-instead-of-incarceration program, enacted by voters in 2000. Under Prop 36, no one can be incarcerated for a simple drug possession offense unless they have first been given a chance at state licensed/certified treatment. The elimination of all drug treatment funding for nonviolent drug possession offenders would mean tens of thousands of nonviolent users each year would face no possibility of incarceration in jail or prison. People who are arrested but not provided access to the required treatment cannot be incarcerated.

“By eliminating funding for Prop 36, the Legislature ensures that fewer people will be sent to jail or prison for a drug possession offense,” said Daniel Abrahamson, Legal Affairs Director of the Drug Policy Alliance. “We applaud them for recognizing that scarce resources shouldn’t be spent to incarcerate low-level drug offenders. But treatment through Prop 36 works. Wiping out these services will wreak major human damage, prove very costly in the long run, and further weaken California’s health. This action threatens to leave first- and second-time drug possession offenders on the streets, unsupervised and without access to treatment to which they are legally entitled.”

Since 2000, Prop 36 has provided treatment to 36,000 people a year, sharply reduced the number of drug offenders in prison, and reduced state costs by $2 billion. Over 280,000 people have entered community-based treatment under Prop 36, half of whom had never received treatment before. The number of people in state prison for drug possession has decreased 40% since Prop 36 took effect. According to UCLA, for every $1 invested in Prop 36, the state saves a net $2.50 to $4.00. Average per-person treatment costs are about $3,300, while incarceration in state prison costs $49,000 per year.

As part of the 2009 Federal Stimulus, California received $225 million through the Edward Byrne Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program. This is the only source of funding for drug treatment in the federal stimulus package and can be applied toward Prop 36.

“As sponsors of Prop 36, the Drug Policy Alliance knows treatment works. The Legislature and the Governor have agreed to eradicate the only public safety program with independent evaluation that shows success in reducing recidivism and addiction. It will take years to rebuild the treatment programs Prop 36 made possible,” Abrahamson said. “We urge the Legislature to apply federal stimulus dollars to this crucial program.”

 

 



Provide Feedback on this Page:

* 1.




 2.



 3.



   Please leave this field empty