Drug Policy Alliance Logo
About Take Action News Publications and Library Blog Contact Donate Events Community eStore
Home > State By State > Nevada

State By State State By State

Reform Conf 2009

Marijuana: The Facts
What's Wrong With the Drug War?
Overdose
Safety First: Parents, Teens and Drugs
Drug By Drug
State By State
Reducing Harm: Treatment and Beyond
Drugs, Police & the Law
Communities Affected
Drug Policy Around the World
Publications and Library
What People are Talking About

Your Email
> Manage Subscriptions
What People are Talking About

Join the Drug Policy Alliance Network's work to promote drug policies based on science, compassion, health, and human rights.
Donate
> Get Involved
In this Section
bottom
The Latest

An Exit Strategy for the Drug War



Send A Message
Full Text Resources

> more

  

Reform in Nevada

Last updated on May 6, 2004.

In less than three years, Nevada has reversed its approach to marijuana offenses. In 1996 and 1998, voters approved an initiative legalizing the medicinal use of marijuana (amendments to the constitution are required to pass twice in the state in order to become law). In June of 2000, a 40-member judicial commission - headed by the Nevada Supreme Court's Chief Justice - recommended reducing penalties for possession of small amounts of marijuana for personal use from a felony to a misdemeanor. In November of 2000, voters approved the medical marijuana initiative a second time (under Nevada law, initiatives have to be approved twice before they can take effect). In 2001, the legislature passed legislation implementing the medical marijuana initiative and decriminalizing small amounts of marijuana for personal use. 

In November of 2002, the highly publicized Question 9 was defeated by voters at the ballot box. Question 9 would have legalized three ounces or less of marijuana for personal use. The initiative was heavily campaigned against, and vehemently opposed by, the federal Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). Drug Czar John Walters has refused to declare how many taxpayer dollars were spent on his campaign against Question 9. Efforts are underway to force Walters to disclose his exorbitant spending.

Nevada Attorney General Sandoval criticized Walters for his interference: "It is unfortunate that a representative of the federal government substantially intervened in a matter that was clearly a State of Nevada issue. The excessive federal intervention that was exhibited in this instance is particularly disturbing because it sought to influence the outcome of a Nevada election.

A signature drive is currently underway to place a decriminalization initiative on the November 2004 ballot.

Organizations and Resources in Nevada:



Provide Feedback on this Page:

* 1.




 2.



 3.



   Please leave this field empty